A common way to store and administer therapeutic protein to patients is via prefilled glass-syringes. Silicone oil, which is used as a syringe lubricant, could induce protein loss, but the addition of surfactant has been shown to reduce such loss. A study has been made to get a deeper understanding of why this is the case [1]. Here we present a summary of how the protein-silicone oil interaction was analyzed in the presence and absence of surfactant.
To be able to analyze the protein interaction with the silicone oil/water interface, a model system that mimics protein formulation in silicone oil lubricated syringes was designed [1]. Glass sensors, spin-coated with silicone oil, were to represent the silicone oil lubricated syringe, and the silicone oil coated sensors were then exposed to the model protein together with different non-ionic surfactants.
The protein-silicone oil surface interaction was analyzed with QSense® QCM-D, a surface-sensitive technology that monitors mass uptake at the surface in real-time. In addition to the mass, QCM-D also senses the structure of the layer adsorbed (or bound) at the surface. The adsorption behavior of the model protein, both in the absence and presence of two different surfactants, PS-80 and Poloxamer, were measured and compared.
The time-resolved mass changes, Fig. 1, showed that the total amount adsorbed is smaller when PS-80 is added to the protein solution, compared to when there is no surfactant present. The addition of Poloxamer 188, however, did not alter the amount adsorbed significantly. A possible explanation for this observation, presented by the authors [1], could be that PS-80 shows faster adsorption kinetics onto the oil-water interface than the model protein on its own (data not shown). This would allow PS-80 to form a protective layer at the surface, and thereby be more effective in preventing the protein adsorption, compared to Poloxamer 188, which binds more slowly to the interface.
Figure 1. Time-resolved mass change upon injection of the three samples i) protein, ii) protein with PS-80 and iii) protein with Poloxamer 188.
It was concluded that the time-resolved QCM-D analysis could provide insight into the protein-surface interaction, and how the protein adsorbs at the silicone oil/water interface. It was also concluded that this kind of data can shed light on how formulation additives impact the protein-surface interaction, information which can help decide which additives to use to minimize loss of product.
Download the case study to read more about protein interaction with surfaces with and without the presence of excipient.
Read the guidelines on how to decide which QCM instrument will be the most suitable for your needs
Read about how protein adsorption at various surface and solution conditions quickly can be measured
Read about what single-harmonic and multi-harmonic QCM-D means and what the difference is between these instruments.
Read about how QSense QCM-D analysis is used as a powerful tool to investigate protein-lipid nanoparticles binding affinity
Learn about the difference between the theoretical QCM sensitivity and the sensitivity which is relevant in a measurement situation.
Read about the piezoelectric effect and how piezoelectricity arises
Learn more about QSense 4th generation QCM-D platform which provides a sharper tool in the scientist toolbox and simplifies data interpretation.
Learn about how biointerfaces and biomolecular interactions can be studied using QSense® QCM-D and what information these measurements offer.
Read about Prof. Jackman's experience using QCM-D to study surfactant-interaction with model membranes
Sign upp for the webinar to learn more about how QCM-D is used to study biomaterial-induced activation of the immune system
Learn about what aspects to consider after you have run a QCM measurement